A former Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Mike Igini, has expressed regret over spending a decade with the electoral body, saying he feels his efforts did not yield the desired reforms.
Igini, who served as REC in Akwa Ibom State, made the remark while reflecting on his years in office. He stated that despite his commitment to strengthening electoral integrity, systemic challenges limited the impact of his work.
According to him, his 10-year tenure at INEC was marked by persistent efforts to promote transparency and credibility in elections. However, he suggested that entrenched interests and institutional constraints often stood in the way of meaningful change.
Igini said he joined the commission with the hope of contributing to a more credible and transparent electoral process. Over the years, he became known for his outspoken stance on electoral reforms and adherence to established guidelines.
During his time in office, he was involved in the conduct and supervision of several elections, including the governorship and general elections. His role required overseeing electoral preparations, monitoring compliance with regulations, and ensuring that the voting process adhered to the law.
Reflecting on his service, Igini indicated that he often faced resistance when pushing for strict compliance with electoral procedures. He suggested that the political environment surrounding elections posed significant obstacles to reform.
The former REC maintained that credible elections are central to Nigeria’s democratic stability. He noted that electoral management bodies must be insulated from undue influence to function effectively.
Igini’s comments come amid ongoing debates about electoral reforms and public confidence in Nigeria’s electoral system. Questions about transparency, independence, and accountability have remained central to discussions on democratic consolidation.
He emphasized the importance of institutional integrity within INEC, stating that the credibility of the commission depends on the commitment of its officials to uphold the rule of law. At the same time, he implied that structural reforms are necessary to address systemic weaknesses.
Observers say Igini’s tenure was marked by a firm approach to electoral guidelines, sometimes putting him at odds with political actors. His outspoken positions often drew public attention.
While expressing regret over his time at the commission, Igini reiterated his belief in democratic principles. He urged stakeholders to continue advocating for reforms that would strengthen electoral credibility.
INEC, as Nigeria’s electoral umpire, plays a critical role in organizing and conducting elections at the federal and state levels. The commission’s performance has frequently been scrutinized, particularly during closely contested polls.
Igini’s remarks add to the broader discourse on the challenges facing electoral institutions in the country. Calls for greater independence, improved logistics, and stricter enforcement of electoral laws have featured prominently in recent years.
As debates over electoral reforms continue, his reflections highlight the complexities of managing elections in a diverse and politically competitive environment. His comments are likely to further fuel conversations about the future direction of Nigeria’s electoral system and the need for sustained institutional reform.
