BREAKING: Court asked to sack Rivers’ Sole Administrator, Vice Admiral Ibas

The Federal High Court in Abuja has been asked to remove the newly appointed Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas (Retired). The request was filed in a suit challenging the legality of his appointment, raising concerns about whether it aligns with constitutional provisions and due process.

The lawsuit was brought by a group of stakeholders who argue that the appointment of a sole administrator is unconstitutional. According to them, the Nigerian Constitution does not provide for such a position to govern a state, and they contend that the proper democratic process must be followed. They insist that Rivers State should have a duly elected governor or, at the very least, an acting governor in line with constitutional guidelines.

The appointment of Ibas came amid a political crisis in Rivers State, following a prolonged dispute over the leadership of the state. His appointment was made as a temporary measure to stabilize governance, but critics believe it is an overreach of executive power. Those opposing the move argue that it undermines democracy and the principles of federalism in Nigeria.

Legal experts have weighed in on the controversy, with some arguing that the appointment lacks legal backing. They point out that the Nigerian Constitution clearly outlines the procedures for replacing a governor and that a sole administrator is not one of the recognized options. Others, however, argue that the appointment may be justified under certain emergency provisions, depending on the circumstances leading to the decision.

The federal government has defended the move, stating that it was necessary to prevent a governance vacuum in Rivers State. Officials argue that the appointment was made in the interest of stability and order, given the political turmoil that had affected the state’s administration. They maintain that Ibas is a capable leader with a strong background in administration and crisis management, making him a suitable choice to handle affairs temporarily.

Opposition parties and civil society organizations have condemned the decision, calling it a dangerous precedent that could be used to undermine democracy in other states. They warn that allowing a sole administrator to govern a state without a clear constitutional basis could lead to further political interference at the state level. Some groups have even called for protests and legal action to challenge the decision.

The case has now been brought before the Federal High Court in Abuja, where a judge will determine whether the appointment should stand or be overturned. The outcome of this legal challenge could have significant implications for governance and constitutional law in Nigeria. If the court rules against the appointment, it could force the federal government to reconsider its approach to handling political crises in states.

Meanwhile, supporters of Ibas argue that he should be given a chance to govern, at least temporarily, until a permanent solution is reached. They highlight his experience in leadership and administration as key qualifications that make him fit for the role. However, critics insist that legality must take precedence over experience or efficiency.

As the legal battle unfolds, the political situation in Rivers State remains uncertain. Many residents are watching closely, hoping for a resolution that ensures stability while upholding democratic principles. The decision of the Federal High Court will likely set a precedent for similar cases in the future, shaping the way political disputes are handled in Nigeria’s states.