“Having Money Doesn’t Make You Elite” – Dele Farotimi Criticizes Nigeria’s Power Structure

Dele Farotimi, a Nigerian lawyer and political activist, has criticized the country’s wealthy and influential individuals, arguing that Nigeria lacks an actual elite class. In a statement that has sparked discussions, he described the nation’s powerful figures as a “ruinous class” rather than a true elite, emphasizing that wealth alone does not equate to elitism.

Farotimi, known for his outspoken views on governance and societal issues, suggested that those in power and control of resources in Nigeria have contributed more to the nation’s problems than to its progress. He pointed out that in many parts of the world, an elite class is characterized by excellence, leadership, and contributions to society, but in Nigeria, the ruling and wealthy class has largely engaged in actions that have hindered national development.

His remarks align with growing frustrations among Nigerians regarding governance, economic struggles, and widespread corruption. Many critics argue that those who hold power and influence in Nigeria often use their positions for personal gain rather than for the collective good. Farotimi’s statement reflects this sentiment, highlighting the disconnect between affluence and genuine societal leadership.

Over the years, Nigeria has faced persistent issues related to governance, accountability, and economic disparity. While the country boasts immense natural and human resources, mismanagement and corruption have often stifled progress. Farotimi’s comments resonate with many Nigerians who feel that the country’s wealthiest and most powerful figures have not used their influence to foster national development.

His critique also raises a broader question about what defines an elite class. In many societies, elites are expected to drive innovation, governance, and economic growth. However, in Nigeria, the dominant class has often been associated with exploitation rather than progress. Farotimi’s statement challenges the perception that financial success alone grants someone the status of an elite, instead arguing that true elitism should be based on merit, integrity, and contribution to society.

The reaction to his comments has been mixed, with some agreeing that Nigeria’s powerful class has been more detrimental than beneficial to the nation. Others, however, argue that there are individuals within the wealthy and political class who have made positive contributions. Despite this debate, Farotimi’s words have added to ongoing conversations about the need for accountability and better leadership in Nigeria.

As Nigeria continues to grapple with economic challenges, insecurity, and governance issues, discussions like these highlight the urgent need for reforms. Farotimi’s perspective underscores the frustration of many Nigerians who believe that the country needs leaders and influencers who prioritize national progress over personal enrichment. Whether or not his critique will lead to any significant change remains to be seen, but it has certainly fueled the discourse on leadership and responsibility in Nigeria.