Recalling a Nigerian Lawmaker Is as Complex as Holding Three Elections, Says Former INEC Official

A former official of Nigeria’s Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has stated that the process of recalling a lawmaker is as demanding as conducting three separate elections. The former INEC official explained that recalling an elected representative requires extensive administrative and logistical efforts, making it one of the most challenging electoral exercises in the country.

The official highlighted that the recall process is governed by strict constitutional requirements, which make it a rare and difficult occurrence. According to Nigeria’s legal framework, a recall begins when registered voters in the affected constituency submit a petition signed by at least 50% of the electorate. This petition must then be verified by INEC, a process that involves thorough scrutiny to ensure authenticity.

Once the petition is verified, INEC is mandated to conduct a referendum in the constituency. This referendum requires that a simple majority of voters support the recall for it to be successful. However, meeting the necessary voter turnout threshold remains a major challenge, as past attempts at recalling lawmakers have often failed due to insufficient participation.

The former INEC official emphasized that organizing a recall is similar to holding three separate elections because it involves multiple stages of verification, public participation, and voting. Unlike regular elections, where candidates campaign for votes, a recall demands active mobilization from constituents who must be willing to participate in all phases of the process. This complexity often results in prolonged legal battles and political interference, further complicating the procedure.

In Nigeria’s political history, successful recall attempts have been rare. Several efforts to unseat lawmakers through the recall process have failed due to legal hurdles, insufficient voter participation, or political influences. Many politicians facing recall petitions have leveraged their influence to challenge the process, sometimes leading to delays or outright dismissals.

The former official noted that the high level of difficulty in executing a recall serves as both a safeguard and a limitation. While it prevents frivolous attempts to remove elected officials, it also makes it nearly impossible for voters to hold their representatives accountable once elected. Some critics argue that the recall process is intentionally designed to be cumbersome, discouraging voters from initiating it even in cases of poor governance or misconduct.

The discussion around the recall process has gained renewed attention in recent times, with some calling for a review of the legal requirements to make it more achievable. However, any amendments would require constitutional changes, which involve a lengthy legislative process. Until such changes are made, recalling a Nigerian lawmaker remains an arduous task that, according to the former INEC official, is as complex as organizing three full elections.