Sagay replies Atiku, Saraki, others, says Buhari has legal right to suspend Onnoghen

– Chairman of PACAC, Prof. Itse Sagay, has replied Atiku and Saraki over their comments on Onnoghen’s suspension

– President Muhammadu Buhari on Friday, January 25, suspended CJN, Walter Onnoghen, over his failure to declare some of his assets as required by law

– Sagay, however, said that the president’s action was in line with the rule of law as there was a valid order, which he obeyed

The chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), Prof. Itse Sagay (SAN), on Friday, January 25, said President Muhammadu Buhari only obeyed a court order in suspending Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Walter Onnoghen.

The Nation reports that he said the president’s action was in line with the rule of law as there was a valid order, which he obeyed.

Tracknews.ng gathered that Sagay said that Chief Justice Onnoghen’s removal was also morally justified as he had admitted that he did not fully comply with the assets declaration requirements.

The constitutional lawyer agreed that the Constitution empowers the president to remove the CJN through the Senate.

However, he argued that the president could also suspend the CJN pending when the Senate votes on whether the CJN should be removed or not.

According to him, the CJN could return to his post if the Senate does not remove him by a two-thirds majority.

Sagay said: “The suspension is morally justified and legally justified. Morally, he should not be in that office considering what has happened. Legally, the president has powers to remove him.

“The Code of Conduct Tribunal gave an order that the CJN should be removed from office. So, the President carried out a court order. “If anyone says it’s an exparte application, my answer is that all the orders they got from courts over the matter were ex-parte.

“If they have been using ex-parte, they have no moral right to quarrel if the prosecution applies the same method in one case as against four in their own case.

“So, the President was obeying a court order and for the rule of law to prevail, he should obey court orders. That’s number one.

“Two, without even going to court, Section 292 (1) of the Constitution provides for the CJN’s removal, including over a breach of the Code of Conduct. He has committed a breach of the Code of Conduct and he has admitted it.

“The only person who can remove the CJN in the Constitution is the President. The removal could take the form of presentation of the matter before the Senate by the President.

“The Senate cannot bring the matter before themselves, nor can the National Judicial Council. So, the president, in trying to exercise the power of removal of the Chief Justice for breach of Code of Conduct, can first suspend him. Hide original message

“He can then take his name to the Senate for consideration for permanent removal. If the case fails and the Senate cannot vote by two-thirds majority, then the CJN returns to his post.

“This is my own interpretation. “But the government has adopted the alternative option of obeying a clear court order which accords with the rule of law.”