A civil society organisation, Nigeria Democratic Rights Advocacy (NDRA), has called for an investigation into what it describes as inconsistencies in the records of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), following the listing of Barrister Reuben Egwuaba as National Legal Adviser to two separate political parties.
In a statement issued on Sunday, the group expressed concern over Egwuaba’s appearance on INEC’s official website as a key officer of both the Allied Peoples Movement (APM) and the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC). One of the listings was reportedly marked as being “by court order,” further raising questions about the legitimacy of the entries.
The NDRA said the issue goes beyond a simple administrative error, describing it as a potentially serious violation of Nigeria’s electoral laws. The statement, signed by the group’s General Secretary, Julius Aondowase, highlighted what it termed “disturbing inconsistencies” in official party documentation maintained by the electoral body.
According to the group, Nigeria’s amended Electoral Act clearly prohibits individuals from holding membership in more than one political party at the same time. It referenced provisions under Section 77, which explicitly outlaw dual-party membership and prescribe penalties for violations.
The organisation stressed that the role of National Legal Adviser is a significant and sensitive position within a political party’s National Executive Committee. It noted that such a role requires full allegiance and exclusive membership to a single party, making Egwuaba’s dual listing particularly concerning.
NDRA argued that if the records are accurate, the situation could amount to prima facie evidence of dual-party membership, which may constitute a criminal offence under Nigerian law. It added that the law provides for penalties including a fine of up to ₦10 million, imprisonment for up to two years, or both, for individuals found guilty of such violations.
The group also raised concerns about the broader implications of the issue for Nigeria’s democratic system. It warned that allowing such discrepancies to persist without clarification could undermine public trust in political institutions and electoral processes.
NDRA called for immediate clarification from all parties involved, including INEC, the APM, and the NDC. It said that if the listings are incorrect, there should be a prompt correction and a clear explanation of how the conflicting information was recorded on an official platform.
The organisation emphasized that political parties and regulatory bodies must ensure strict compliance with the law to maintain the integrity of the democratic system. It cautioned against treating legal contradictions lightly, noting that such issues could set a dangerous precedent if left unaddressed.
Furthermore, the group urged relevant authorities to launch a thorough investigation into the matter without delay. It insisted that accountability must be enforced in accordance with the law, regardless of the individuals or institutions involved.
NDRA concluded by reiterating the importance of upholding the rule of law in Nigeria’s democracy. It stated that democratic governance must be guided by clear rules and legal consistency, rather than convenience or administrative lapses.
